So it is possible, that my truth, may differ from yours...
1997.
Sequences from Satya were getting a fabulous response from those
that previewed it. We were editing alongside the filming. Ramu was a
very instinctive director and was confident enough to alter characters &
screenplay as he went along. His vision was broadening before our eyes. Saurabh
Shukla was on set playing Kallu Mama as well as collaborating as a writer. Anurag
Kashyap too was writing on location, other times he wrote in the evenings at Ramu’s large
but modest Four Bungalows apartment.
It was a vodka/whisky darbar and young non-drinkers (or
beer-drinkers like me) spent evenings like this without a glass. I can be corny and say that we were intoxicated
in the air of a brilliant collaboration! The fit and pretty Urmila Matondkar hung
out with us too, she was warm and charming, a complete departure from her cold
& reserved self on set.
Along with the other assistants like Barnali Ray (now
Shukla), Pradnya Lokhande (now Sharma), Feroze and Dev, I too pondered about
the plausibility of the Ramu-Urmila affair as was reported. We looked for
clues in those casual evenings, and convened later on to exchange notes. My close friends would often ask for gossip and I would try to look for
evidence. If you’re eager to know, I never did find it;
nothing conclusive at least.
The location was a stinky stable in the suburb of Jogeshwari
where Manoj Pahwa’s character introduces Satya to his new home. I wasn’t sure
about Chakri’s dialogue delivery, but there was comfort in the talk that it might
be dubbed later. A few hours into the shoot Ramu received a phone-call. I saw
before my eyes the blood drain from his face. His friend, media baron Gulshan
Kumar had been murdered, riddled indiscriminately with bullets.
Ramu became very disturbed. We stopped work and followed
him around for more news, he was among the few with a mobile-phone. It dawned upon me for the first time,
how close to the truth our film was. Ramu was taking a great risk by making a
film on the extortion enterprise while gangsters still ruled Bombay. I didn’t
know then, that much of the film’s story-flow would be altered post this
incident.
'Chakri & Manjo'
I liked Chakri (Chakravarti). He came from an acting
background that I was familiar with. My mother is a Telugu girl and I had seen
many Telugu film’s while growing up. I empathized with Chakri’s discomfort with
Hindi and we spent a lot of time together, discussing his plans for the
character. I was also privy to Chakri’s soft-spot for another crewmember and I
often dispensed to him the wisdom of a 19 yr old.
Manoj Bajpai also became a close friend. I called him ‘Manjo’.
Manoj often hitched a ride with me on my rickety-old Kinetic Honda, came out clubbing
with me and my friends, and even had a few drinks with my father. Manoj had the utmost
awe for the work I was doing, and encouraged me to follow my style. One day
Manoj signed an agreement with me stating that he would act in my 1st
film for 2 rupees. Even though it was written on a paper napkin, I was sure
that it would stand the test of time. Manoj was a talent like we had never seen
before, and I remember feeling like I had hit the jackpot.
I learned much later that
‘editors are an actors best friend’. So when I bonded recently with the talented Rajkumar Yadav during the making of Shahid, we added a line to this pearl
of wisdom…‘till the film is complete.’ ;)
Chakri and Manoj were another ‘hit-duo’ from Satya, who’s
celluloid chemistry didn’t exactly come from admiration for the other. Their
rivalry was less subdued than the other’s, and it worked wonders for the film. It was
the battle of the North Indian vs the South Indian, of the NSD actor vs the
commercial actor. I thought that both vied to be Ramu’s pet actor. But then everyone
was in awe of Mr Varma, he commanded it effortlessly.
I had mentioned in my previous blog, the tension between
Anurag & Saurabh, and I think from Anurag’s reactions to my blog, that he
took my claim very seriously. I didn’t mean to say that their friction over credit on the
promo caused any bad blood. It seemed quite innocent, and was obviously channeled
correctly, which is why they wrote a cracker of a film. Besides the ones
mentioned above, there were a couple of other ‘teams’ that struggled for their
individual place in the sun.
Let me pose a few questions, and see if there is a one-word/one
name answer that comes to mind.
‘To whom would you attribute the cinematography of Satya?’ Would you say
it was the American veteran DP Gerhard Hooper or the realistic documentary
cameraman, Mazhar Kamran? Both were eventually credited.
‘Whose words were Satya really based on?’ Were they Saurabh
Shukla’s--who was basking from his association with the semantic Bandit Queen & Is Raat Ki Subah Nahi
or were they Anurag Kashyap’s--who was this wonder-kid that everyone was
talking about and had just written Jayate (Hansal Mehta’s
first tryst with the courtroom). Both were credited.
'Who’s music will Satya be remembered for?' Vishal Bharadwaj's?--The man who infused emotion into the film with songs like the dreamy Badalon se kaat kaat ke or Sandeep
Chowta--who’s stark and intense themes reverberated in a shattering new system
called DTS. Both were credited.
'Who actually edited Satya?' Apurva Asrani, the urban kid who had made
promos for Sanjay Bhansali’s Khamoshi and Ramu’s Daud or was it Bhanodaya-the Telugu
editor who had earlier edited Ramu’s Ana Ganaga Oku Roju & Daud? Both were
credited.
While Manoj-Chakri, Saurabh-Anurag, Gerry-Mazhar, Vishal-Sandeep will be best suited to answer how they felt about sharing credit at the time, they will also be able to tell you why why none of them ever teamed up again. I can only tell you how I felt. I got asked for years, 'who edited Satya?' and that question used to make me angry. I guess, the simplest thing for me would have been to say 'we both did'.
But to me, that would have been a diplomatic answer, not neccesarily an honest one.
Jump Cut to: Bhanodaya
If I remember right, Satya was the first Hindi film to be
cut on avid. We were choosing a work-flow that required us to make a print from
the negative, transfer the print to tape, digitize the tapes
onto the hard disk and then start editing. The process was fascinating and I
think we used Avid to its fullest potential to maintain a fresh & compelling rhythm, now synonymous with the film. But it is when the film was
edited, and the technical process had to be reversed, that Ramu began to get angsty. He was nervous about matching the
negative to an Avid produced cut-list. He was worried that something may go wrong with
the negative. He began to feel that his judgment would work best if he saw a
print before locking the film. So Ramu brought in his Daud editor Bhanodaya,
specifically to match the print to the list.
What I didn’t see coming, was that I would have to share
credit with Bhanodaya. This came as a bolt from the blue. I first heard about it from
Ramu’s cousin, Satya's Executive Producer, Som Shekhar. I felt somewhat cheated by Ramu
and began to find it impossible make-up lies about how Bhanodaya had co-edited the
film. Jitesh Pillai, then the bright kid at Filmfare had interviewed me for his magazine, and had asked me about Bhano. I remember saying, ‘I
don’t know Bhano, I never met him during the editing of the film’. It was the truth,
but my lack of diplomacy and patience brought out the arrogance in me.
What made things worse were the rumors going around. I would
hear that Ramu had gone about telling people that I had only cut the promos of
the film, and that Bhano was the editor. Now whether the rumors were true or whether
people were fanning my anger, I was too naïve to know.
Filmfare Awards, February 1998
I remember the night of the Filmfare awards when the
award for 'Best Editing' was announced. I was sitting among my loved ones who became very emotional and
pushed me towards the stage to collect the award. As I walked, from the corner of my eye, I
looked at a familiar man, wearing a black shirt, who also began walking towards
the podium. I remember thinking ‘I hardly know that man, have not had a single
creative exchange with him, but he is sharing my award.' Bhanodaya was being celebrated
for my work, and it just didnt make sense.
There was only one award statuette. So I buckled my speed.
Bhanodaya also walked faster. He had had the advantage of being two rows ahead--with Ramu. I was like an energizer bunny, high from the industry's acknowledgment
of my skills, but somewhat wounded by the sudden U-turn of my mentor. I somehow got to Jeetendra and Poonam
Dhillon first, and they handed me the statuette. Bhanodaya followed behind me
and shook hands with them after I did. As I held up the coveted statuette in
the air, a much shorter Bhanoday reached for it, touched it, and smiled.
If only I had known then, that I would get opportunities to prove myself again; to be part of some meaningful cinematic attempts. If I had know then that I would see other awards and some rewards that are far greater than trophies, I would have shared that award gracefully with Bhanodaya. After all, his efforts touched the final product too.
So my dear colleague Bhanodaya, I guess it isn't too late to say 'Congratulations....! for our Filmfare award for Satya!'
---by Apurva Asrani